Blog

Static Sites vs WordPress for SEO: Real-World Results for UK Small Businesses

Feb 6, 2026

Why This Follow-Up Matters

The first article makes the case that WordPress is outdated for many small businesses.

This one answers the question business owners actually care about:

“Will a static site help me get more enquiries from Google?”

For UK small businesses and UK SMEs, SEO isn’t about “traffic” in the abstract — it’s about local visibility, trust, and consistent enquiries.


What Google Actually Rewards

Google doesn’t rank websites because they use WordPress or because they’re static.

It ranks pages that deliver a better overall experience:

  • Fast loading on mobile
  • Stable layout and interaction (no jumping, lag, or blocked clicks)
  • Helpful content that satisfies the search intent
  • Clear relevance to the topic and the audience

Performance alone won’t make weak content rank.

But performance can absolutely stop a good site being held back.


Core Web Vitals: The Practical Difference

When people talk about “static sites are faster”, this is what they usually mean in practice:

  • LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): how quickly the main content appears
  • INP (Interaction to Next Paint): how responsive the page feels when someone taps/clicks
  • CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): whether the page jumps around while loading

WordPress can score well — but only after:

  • caching,
  • optimisation,
  • plugin control,
  • and ongoing maintenance.

A static site tends to start closer to “good” by default because it serves pre-built HTML with minimal runtime overhead.


Static vs WordPress: The SEO-Relevant Comparison (UK SME View)

Factor WordPress (typical SME setup) Static site (Eleventy-style)
Page generation Dynamic (PHP + database) Pre-built HTML
Speed baseline Often needs optimisation Often fast by default
Plugin impact High (SEO/security/performance plugins common) Minimal (fewer moving parts)
Attack surface Admin login + plugins + DB Much smaller (no CMS runtime)
Stability Updates can break layout/functionality Deploys are predictable
Crawl efficiency Can be OK, but depends on speed and bloat Usually clean + consistent
Ongoing work Updates, patching, monitoring Content + occasional build updates

This is why static sites are often easier to keep fast over time.


The Real SEO Gains After a Migration (What Usually Changes)

When a WordPress-to-static migration improves SEO, it’s rarely “magic”.

It’s usually one or more of these:

1) Faster pages reduce abandonment

If a mobile visitor doesn’t wait for the page, they don’t read it, click, or enquire.

Static sites typically:

  • load more consistently,
  • render faster,
  • and feel smoother on low-end mobile devices.

2) Cleaner pages are easier for Google to interpret

Heavy theme markup, builders, and stacked plugins can produce messy HTML.

Static builds tend to produce:

  • simpler HTML,
  • fewer scripts,
  • fewer render-blocking assets, which improves both crawl and user experience.

3) Better engagement signals (because the site feels “professional”)

This is the underrated part.

When a site feels fast and stable, users trust it more. Trust increases:

  • time on page,
  • scrolling,
  • clicking,
  • and enquiries.

What Clients Typically See (Without Overpromising)

Every site is different, but typical outcomes I aim for in UK SME migrations include:

  • Key pages loading in under ~2 seconds on real mobile connections
  • A noticeable reduction in “maintenance emergencies”
  • A tighter security posture with fewer exposed components
  • A cleaner content structure that supports long-term SEO growth

Important: if your content strategy is weak, speed improvements won’t fix that. But speed improvements can remove friction and unlock the value of your content.


The Migration That Actually Works (Practical Approach)

A successful migration isn’t “copy the old site and hope”.

It’s usually:

  1. Map the existing URLs

    • keep the same URLs where possible
    • plan 301 redirects for anything that changes
  2. Keep the SEO signals

    • titles, meta descriptions, headings
    • internal links
    • structured data where relevant
  3. Fix the content that’s holding you back

    • thin pages
    • unclear service messaging
    • duplicate pages
    • slow-loading media
  4. Launch clean

    • validate redirects
    • submit sitemap
    • check indexing and crawl stats in Search Console

When WordPress Still Wins on SEO (Yes, Sometimes)

WordPress can still be a strong choice when you have:

  • multi-author publishing needs
  • complex editorial workflows
  • large dynamic features (eCommerce, membership portals)
  • a team that can maintain and govern plugins properly

For most service-based UK SMEs, that’s not the reality.

They want a site that:

  • ranks,
  • loads fast,
  • and generates enquiries without becoming a part-time IT job.

  • “Why WordPress Is Outdated for Most Small Businesses”

If you’re reading this because your site feels slow or fragile, start here:

See my services for small business websites Book a consultation


If you’re considering a WordPress-to-static migration and want it done without SEO loss, I can review your current site and map a safe plan.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a static site automatically rank higher than WordPress?

No. SEO still depends on content quality, relevance, internal linking, and authority. Static sites often make it easier to achieve strong performance and technical cleanliness, which can support rankings.

Will migrating from WordPress harm my SEO?

It can if URLs change without redirects, metadata is lost, or internal linking breaks. A careful migration plan keeps SEO signals intact and often improves performance at the same time.

What is the biggest SEO win from going static?

For most small businesses, it is reliability: fast load times, cleaner pages, and fewer technical fires that quietly degrade performance over time.

Share on LinkedIn